Author: admin

  • Designing Your Outfit Like a Brand: What Fashion Can Learn from Visual Design

    Designing Your Outfit Like a Brand: What Fashion Can Learn from Visual Design

    When we think about visual design, we usually picture websites, logos, or apps – not the outfit we throw on before leaving the house. But the more I’ve learned about design processes, the more I’ve realized something kind of funny: getting dressed is basically the same thing as building a brand.

    Think about it. Every time you put together an outfit, you’re making choices about colors, layout, balance, and the overall “vibe.” That’s not just fashion – that’s visual design.

    In digital design, I’ve learned that everything starts with structure. Designers don’t jump straight into colors and fonts – they plan first. This is where concepts like wireframes and mockups come in. A wireframe is like a rough outline, focusing on layout and function before anything looks polished. A mockup comes next, where the visuals – colors, typography, and details – start to take shape. According to CareerFoundry, this process helps designers organize ideas and create a clear user experience before finalizing a product.

    Now we can apply that to fashion. Your base outfit – the jeans and a plain top, for example – is your “wireframe.” It’s the structure. It might not be exciting yet, but it sets the foundation. Then comes the “mockup”: layering pieces, adding color, experimenting with textures, and incorporating accessories. Suddenly, the outfit has personality. By the time you’re done, you’ve created a finished “design” that expresses you!

    This is where branding really comes in. Strong brands are consistent. They have a recognizable identity – specific colors, styles, and messaging that make them stand out. The same idea applies to personal style. Whether you realize it or not, you probably gravitate toward certain silhouettes, color palettes, or aesthetics. That’s your visual identity.

    For example, someone who constantly wears neutral tones and structured pieces might be communicating minimalism and professionalism. Someone else who mixes bold prints and layered accessories might come across as creative and expressive. These choices aren’t random – they’re design decisions.

    Tools matter here, too. In web design, programs like Adobe Illustrator are used to create clean visuals and experiment with different compositions before finalizing a design. In fashion, your “tools” might be your closet, Pinterest boards, or even trying on multiple outfits before settling on one. You’re still going through a process of testing and refining until everything feels right.

    What’s interesting is how often people skip the “planning” stage in both design and fashion. In web design, jumping straight into visuals without structure can lead to confusing, ineffective layouts. In fashion, throwing on random pieces without thinking about balance or cohesion results in an outfit that can feel… off.

    This is why understanding basic visual design principles like balance, contrast, and hierarchy can completely change how you approach getting dressed. A statement jacket creates hierarchy by drawing attention. A mix of fitted and oversized pieces creates balance. A pop of color adds contrast and visual interest. These are the same principles designers use to guide how people experience a website or brand.

    At the end of the day, fashion isn’t just about following trends, but about communication. What do you want your outfit to say for you? When you start thinking of your style as a form of visual design, getting dressed becomes less about guessing and more about intention.

    So next time you’re standing in front of your closet, think like a designer. Start with your “wireframe,” build your “mockup,” and refine your final look. This is such a fun way to look into both designing and picking an outfit, since the two can be pretty similar!!

  • Using Social Media As A Tool For Justice

    Using Social Media As A Tool For Justice

    When we think about social media today, it’s easy to associate it with trends, influencers, or even spreading misinformation. But during major global and political movements, social media has proven it can be a very powerful tool. It can inform, connect, and sometimes even challenge systems of power.

    One huge example is the Arab Spring. At first glance, it almost feels like social media “caused” these revolutions, but it’s a bit more complicated than that. Social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook gave people a space to share information, organize protests, and show the entire world what was happening in real time. Hashtags like #egypt and #libya connected millions of people into one conversation, creating what researchers call “issue publics,” where information can spread quickly during major events (Bruns et al., 2013).

    It is also important to note, however, that social media didn’t single-handedly topple governments. According to the research, it acted more like a tool – something activists used to amplify their voices, but not the sole driver of change (Bruns et al., 2013). People were still physically protesting, organizing on the ground, and risking their lives; social media just made those efforts more visible and connected.

    What really stands out to me is how social media allows everyday people – not just politicians or journalists – to become part of the conversation. During the Arab Spring, videos, tweets, and firsthand accounts were shared globally within seconds. Even when governments tried to shut down the internet, people found ways around it just to keep their voices heard. This says a lot about how powerful these platforms can be when people are determined to use them.

    We’ve also seen similar patterns more recently, when looking at movements like Black Lives Matter which gained massive attention online during the COVID pandemic. Social media has become a space for education, activism, and unity all at once. It gives people the ability to raise awareness, share resources, and challenge those in power.

    With that being said, social media isn’t perfect. One major issue is misinformation. Just like it can spread awareness quickly, it can also spread false information just as fast. And in political movements, that can be dangerous. It can confuse people, create division, or even weaken a cause. This is why knowing the difference between true and false information is so important!!

    At the end of the day, social media is a tool, not a solution. It can amplify voices, build communities, and bring global attention to injustice. But real change still requires action beyond the screen. While social media platforms give celebrities and influencers both power and accessibility, it is what they choose to do with that power that really makes a difference.

    Works Cited

    Bruns, A., Highfield, T., & Burgess, J. (2013). The Arab Spring and Social Media Audiences: English and Arabic Twitter Users and Their Networks: English and Arabic Twitter Users and Their Networks. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 871-898.

  • Award Show Fashion: How Celebrities Are Making Political Movements During Award Show Season

    Award Show Fashion: How Celebrities Are Making Political Movements During Award Show Season

    As someone interested in fashion, besides musical performances I usually only watch award shows for the red carpet. But recently, I’ve noticed something different. It’s not just about the dress or the designer anymore, but the message. Many celebrities are using award shows, usually the bigger ones, to send out political messages to the public.

    This past season, one of the biggest things that stood out to me was how many celebrities were wearing pins. Not just random accessories, but ones with clear messages. At the 2026 Golden Globes, multiple celebrities showed up wearing “ICE OUT” pins, calling attention to issues surrounding U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Associated Press, 2026). And it wasn’t just one or two people—it was a noticeable trend across the carpet.

    Then at the Grammys, it happened again. Artists like Billie Eilish and others wore the same pins, turning what could’ve been just another fashion moment into something bigger (O’Keeffe, 2026). I think what makes this so interesting is how subtle it is. It’s not a full outfit screaming for attention—it’s a small detail that still manages to say a lot.

    The Oscars had their own version of this too. Celebrities were seen wearing “Artists4Ceasefire” pins, showing support for peace in the Israel–Palestine conflict (Moneycontrol, 2026). Again, it’s something you might miss if you’re just focused on the gowns—but once you notice it, it completely changes how you see both the celebrity and the look.

    And it’s not just pins. Some celebrities have gone even further, incorporating political messages directly into their outfits or using interviews and speeches to make their stance clear. At the 2025 Emmys, for example, there were visible expressions of support for the “Free Palestine” movement, both through fashion and public statements (Indiatimes, 2025). At that point, it’s not even subtle anymore – it’s intentional.

    Hannah Einbinder, who won Best Supporting Actress In A Comedy Series at the 77th Emmy Awards, made bold statements at the end of her speech, saying “F*** ICE” and “Free Palestine”.

    I think this shift says a lot about where we are right now. Celebrities have always had influence, but now there’s more pressure to actually use it. Staying silent can almost be seen as taking a stance in itself. So instead of separating fashion from real-world issues, they’re blending the two.

    But at the same time, I get why some people are skeptical. It’s easy to question whether wearing a pin actually does anything. Is it real activism, or just a trend? Personally, I think it’s a bit of both. A pin alone won’t change policy, but it can start conversations. And in a world where everything ends up online within seconds, those conversations can spread fast.

    This is why award show fashion is so interesting right now. It’s not just about aesthetics anymore – it’s about visibility, messaging, and sometimes even protest. What used to be purely visual is now also symbolic.

    So now I’m curious – have you noticed celebrities using fashion to support political movements? Do you think it actually makes an impact, or is it more performative?
    Let me know!!

    Works Cited

    Associated Press. (2026). Celebrities wear pins protesting ICE at the Golden Globes.

    Moneycontrol. (2026). Oscars 2026: Celebrities wear ‘Artists4Ceasefire’ and ‘ICE OUT’ pins.

    O’Keeffe, E. (2026). Celebrities wore “ICE OUT” pins at the Grammys this year.

    (2025). Supporting Actress In A Comedy Series: 77th Emmy Awards. Television Academy.

  • Hierarchy in Layout – And Why It’s So Important

    Hierarchy in Layout – And Why It’s So Important

    Have you ever glanced at a poster and instantly known where to look first? That’s not an accident – it’s the image’s layout hierarchy. In design, hierarchy refers to the arrangement of elements in a way that guides the viewer’s eye, making information easy to process and visually engaging. Whether you’re creating an event flyer, a movie poster, or a social media graphic, hierarchy is what transforms content clutter into clear information.

    Typically, visual hierarchy answers one simple question: what matters most? Designers achieve this by manipulating size, color, contrast, spacing, and placement. Larger elements tend to grab attention first, followed by bold colors or high-contrast visuals. For example, in many event posters, the event title is the largest element, followed by the date and location, and finally supporting details. This structure ensures that viewers quickly understand the key message without feeling overwhelmed (Piktochart, 2026).

    Here is an infographic I wanted to point out from FreeLogoServices, showcasing the path readers usually take when things like typography, logo, and size are manipulated.

    Movie posters are one of the best examples of hierarchy done right. They often prioritize a central image – usually the main character – paired with a bold title and minimal text. According to research, “the best movie poster designs balance a unique and innovative concept with some inherited elements of genre-specific design,” typically to guide the viewer’s attention step by step (TutsPlus, 2023). Without this structure, even the most visually stunning poster can feel confusing or forgettable.

    Hierarchy isn’t just about aesthetics, it’s also about communication. Think about event promotion graphics. These designs need to convey information quickly because viewers often only glance at them for a few seconds. Successful event graphics emphasize the most important details first, such as the event name and date, before leading the viewer to secondary information like sponsors or additional descriptions (SharperNet). This layered approach ensures that even a quick glance delivers value to anyone reading.

    Something I found interesting was that not all hierarchy follows the same rules. Some designs intentionally break traditional structure to stand out. Polish movie posters, for example, are known for their unconventional layouts and artistic interpretations. Rather than clearly presenting actors or scenes, they often rely on abstract imagery and experimental typography. While this approach may seem chaotic, it still uses hierarchy, just in a more expressive way. The focal point might be symbolic rather than literal, encouraging viewers to think more deeply about the message (Sabukaru, n.d.).

    Examples of Polish movie posters that have led audiences to deeper thoughts about these films and projects.

    Digital platforms like Dribbble and GraphicRiver showcase how modern designers experiment with hierarchy in event promotion. Many designs use bold typography layered over images, vibrant color gradients, and asymmetrical layouts to create movement and interest. Despite these creative risks, the most effective designs still maintain a clear visual path. Your eye knows where to start and where to go next, even if you don’t understand visual layout.

    Ultimately, hierarchy is what makes a design “sticky.” It captures attention, holds it, and delivers information efficiently. Without it, even the most creative ideas can fall flat. But with it, your designs can communicate clearly, look professional, and leave a lasting impression on your audiences.

  • Why You Can’t Stop Scrolling (Is It A Good Thing?)

    Why You Can’t Stop Scrolling (Is It A Good Thing?)

    Be honest – how many times have you opened TikTok “for five minutes” and looked up after doom scrolling for an hour?

    Don’t worry, it happens to us all.

    That feeling is called stickiness. In social media, stickiness refers to how well content keeps you coming back, staying longer, and interacting more. It’s the reason you binge videos, double-tap posts, and fall into comment-section rabbit holes.

    Stickiness, however, isn’t just about wasting time. It can actually be used for something good!

    According to research on platforms like YouTube, stickiness is driven by things like interactivity, sharing behavior, and personal motivation—basically, content that makes you feel involved and connected keeps you around longer (Chiang & Hsiao, 2015). Things like comments, likes, reposts, and other actions help make you feel like part of something.

    If content creators and organizations understand what makes something “sticky,” they can use it to promote causes that matter. For example, awareness campaigns, mental health resources, or social justice movements can use emotional storytelling, relatable content, and interactive features to pull people in and keep them engaged. The more time people spend with meaningful content, the more likely they are to learn, share, and take action.

    Even marketing expert Neil Patel emphasizes that “sticky content” works best when it’s valuable, emotional, and easy to engage with – basically, content people actually care about (Patel, n.d).

    While all of this is positive, stickiness can also be negative.

    The same strategies that keep you watching educational videos can also trap you in endless scrolling, misinformation, or content that isn’t exactly helping your mental health. Platforms are designed to keep your attention, not necessarily protect your well-being. And while engagement becomes the goal, it often becomes blurred with so much doom scrolling leading to negative thoughts and perspectives.

    All in all, we can conclude that stickiness isn’t good or bad, but is a tool that depends on how it’s used.

    Creators, brands, and even everyday users have the power to shape the information that spreads. If we focus on content that informs, uplifts, and connects people, social media can actually move us toward a brighter future, instead of a more distracted one.

  • Microtrends vs. Timeless Style: What Should You Actually Buy?

    Microtrends vs. Timeless Style: What Should You Actually Buy?

    If you’ve spent even five minutes on TikTok lately, you’ve probably seen a new “must-have” item every week. One day it’s ballet flats, the next it’s chunky headphones as accessories. Welcome to the world of microtrends – tiny, fast-moving fashion waves that rise and fall almost overnight.

    Microtrends are largely fueled by social media, where content is constantly refreshed and trends spread instantly. Because of this, styles don’t last long – what’s viral today might feel outdated next month (Lee, 2022). Unlike traditional fashion cycles that have lasted decades, microtrends are unpredictable and short-lived, often driven by algorithms and influencer culture rather than designers or seasons (Talbot, 2021).

    On the surface, microtrends are fun. They allow for creativity, experimentation, and self-expression. On the downside, they are deeply tied to fast fashion.

    Polka dots, stripes, camo, capris; microtrends are fun way to mix up your wardrobe!

    Fast fashion brands (SHEIN, TEMU, TikTok Shop) thrive on speed – producing cheap, trendy clothing at an extremely rapid pace to keep up with demand. This model encourages overconsumption, with people buying more clothes and wearing them less. In fact, clothing production has doubled since 2000, and many garments are discarded after only a few wears (McKinsey & Company, 2025). The environmental impact is massive, contributing to significant waste and carbon emissions.

    So where does timeless style come in?

    Timeless fashion is the opposite of microtrends. Examples include neutral blazers, well-fitted jeans, classic white shirts – pieces that don’t just go out of style and can be worn for years. Instead of chasing what’s trending, timeless style focuses on quality, versatility, and longevity.

    As microtrends rise, many consumers – especially Gen Z – are becoming more aware of sustainability and shifting their habits. Some are turning to thrifting or investing in fewer, better-quality pieces to reduce waste (CT Insider, 2025).

    This shift has also spotlighted sustainable designers and brands. Labels like Reformation, Stella McCartney, and Patagonia prioritize ethical production, eco-friendly materials, and transparency. Smaller brands like Paloma Wool also show how creativity and sustainability can coexist (Talbot, 2021).

    On the other hand, sustainable fashion isn’t perfect – it can sometimes be more expensive and sometimes falls into “greenwashing,” where brands exaggerate their eco-friendly efforts. But overall, sustainable clothing encourages a mindset shift: buying less, choosing better, and wearing pieces longer.

    So… what should you actually buy?

    The answer isn’t to completely avoid trends. Fashion should still be fun! But before impulsively buying into every microtrend, I always ask myself these questions:

    • What items do I already have that I can pair this with?
    • Will I wear this more than a few times?
    • Can I style it in multiple ways?
    • Does it align with my personal style?

    A balanced wardrobe might include a few trendy pieces, but should be built on a foundation of timeless staples and sustainable choices.

    Microtrends aren’t going anywhere, but neither is the growing awareness of their impact. As consumers, we have more power than we think. Every purchase, from fast or sustainable fashion, is a vote for the kind of fashion industry we want to support.

    In the past, have you preferred sustainable or fast fashion? Why?

    Works Cited

    Lee, A. (2026). Microtrends: The Implications of What You See on Your “For You” Page. The Harvard Crimson. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2022/2/18/microtends-fashion-think-piece-tiktok/?

    Lutge, K. (2025, June 7). Gen Z is choosing thrifting in Connecticut instead of fast fashion. CT Insider. https://www.ctinsider.com/business/article/gen-z-thrifting-connecticut-fast-fashion-20357233.php?

    Talbot, H. (2021, June 4). Are Instagram microtrends making or breaking sustainable fashion? Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/2021/06/05/are-instagram-microtrends-making-or-breaking-sustainable-fashion?

    What is fast fashion? (2023, December 7). McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-fast-fashion?

  • What’s Trending This Spring (And Why They’re Back)

    What’s Trending This Spring (And Why They’re Back)

    It’s about that time where every time my mom sees my outfit, she talks about how she used to wear the same clothes when she was my age. Like history, fashion has a funny way of repeating itself, and right now, trends from the past are having a major moment again.

    One of the biggest comebacks we’re seeing today? Y2K fashion – aka early 2000s style. Think low-rise jeans, baby tees, and that iconic mix of sporty and sparkly. Back in the day, these looks were everywhere, and now they’re back with a modern twist. Athleisure, in particular, has made a huge return. Originally rooted in comfort-focused early 2000s outfits like velour tracksuits, today’s version blends casual wear with a more polished, street-style edge (PrintKK, 2025). It’s the kind of trend that lets you look put together while still feeling like you’re in pajamas—which, honestly, is a win.

    Collage of workout wear in the 2000s and today, made by Who What Wear.
    “Gen Z Has Just Discovered 2000s Activewear—It’s the Only Thing They’re Wearing to Work Out”

    But it’s not just silhouettes coming back, it’s also bold colors and playful aesthetics. Y2K fashion was never subtle, and today’s revival reflects that same energy. Bright hues, metallic fabrics, and statement pieces are replacing the minimalist “quiet luxury” vibe that dominated recent years. Fashion is shifting toward self-expression again, encouraging people to stand out instead of blend in.

    Another trend making waves? Polka dots. Yes, the same print you might associate with vintage dresses or even your childhood wardrobe is suddenly everywhere again. But this time, it’s not just cute, but elevated. Designers are reimagining polka dots with asymmetrical patterns, bold color combinations, and modern silhouettes (Oh, 2025). Searches for polka dot items have even skyrocketed, showing just how quickly this “retro” print has re-entered the mainstream (Sitton, 2025). What makes this comeback interesting is how it blends nostalgia with sophistication – you can wear polka dots to brunch, class, or even a more dressed-up event.

    Searches for ‘polka dot outfit’ on Pinterest shows a wide variety of how the pattern can be styled!

    And honestly, this whole cycle isn’t random. Fashion is deeply tied to nostalgia, especially during uncertain times. People often look to the past for comfort, which is why styles from the early 2000s, or even earlier decades, feel appealing again. Polka dots, for example, have been around since the 19th century and have resurfaced multiple times, each time with a slightly different vibe (Ahuja, 2025). Now, they’re being styled in ways that feel fresh but still familiar.

    Social media also plays a huge role in bringing these trends back. Platforms like TikTok and Instagram constantly recycle aesthetics, introducing them to new audiences. A trend that someone wore 20 years ago suddenly feels brand new when it shows up on your feed styled in a modern way. Gen Z, in particular, has embraced this mix of old and new, turning thrifted or vintage-inspired pieces into everyday outfits.

    So to tie everything together, fashion isn’t about constantly inventing something new. It’s about reinventing what already exists. Whether it’s Y2K athleisure, bold colors, or polka dots, these trends prove that style is cyclical. What was once “outdated” can easily become the next big thing again.

    And who knows? The outfits we’re wearing today will be considered vintage in just a few years. So if you’ve been holding onto old pieces in your closet… now might be the time to bring them back.

    Works Cited

    Ahuja, S. (2025). How polka dots are making a bold comeback in 2025 fashion. Harper’s Bazaar. https://www.harpersbazaar.in/fashion/story/spot-on-polka-dots-take-over-2025-fashion-trends-1151797-2025-01-09?

    Oh, H. (2025). Polka dots are the fashion trend taking over in 2025. Cosmopolitan. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/style-beauty/fashion/g64728741/polka-dot-fashion-trend/?

    PrintKK. (2025). 15 Y2K fashion trends making a bold comeback in 2025. https://www.printkk.com/blog/articles/y2k-fashion?

    Sitton, S. (2025). Polka-dots are the trending print of 2025. Fashionista. https://fashionista.com/2025/03/shop-polka-dot-trend-dresses-tops-bottoms-2025?

  • Would Kony 2012 Work Today?

    Would Kony 2012 Work Today?

    I’ve just discovered one of early social media’s first viral videos, Kony 2012, and I’ve just realized something: I can’t remember the last time a video has actually made me feel something.

    Watching Kony 2012 – whether for the first time or revisiting it years later – still hits in a surprisingly emotional way. The video doesn’t just present information, it pulls you into a story. It’s structured almost like a documentary-meets-call-to-action, using a mix of personal storytelling, children’s perspectives, and urgent messaging to make you feel like you have to do something. And honestly, that’s what stuck with me the most: that sense of responsibility. Although the video was made 14 years ago, it made the issue feel immediate, like awareness alone could spark real change.

    But rewatching it now, in today’s social media landscape, must feel a little different than it did 14 years ago.

    Back in 2012, the idea of a video going that viral – over 100 million views in days – felt groundbreaking. Now, we’re used to content spreading fast on platforms like TikTok or Instagram. But what Kony 2012 did so well (and what still stands out today) is how strategic it was. It wasn’t just a viral moment – it was a carefully designed campaign. It tapped into emotion, made the message simple (“make Kony famous”), and gave viewers a clear role: share, post, spread the word.

    That emotional pull is something we still see in social media campaigns today. Think about how often content goes viral because it makes people feel something strongly, whether that’s outrage, empathy, or inspiration. The difference is that now, audiences are a bit more skeptical. We’re quicker to question narratives, fact-check, and call thing out. And that’s one of the biggest lessons from Kony 2012.

    One thing that stands out is how Kony 2012 relied heavily on sharing as the main form of participation. The idea was that if enough people reposted the video, it would lead to change. Compare that to campaigns today, like the Ice Bucket Challenge or even newer TikTok trends, where participation is more active. People don’t just share; they do something, create their own version, and bring others into it. That shift from passive to participatory engagement is huge.

    So what can we learn from Kony 2012 as we think about using social media for good?

    First, is that emotion is powerful – but it needs to be paired with responsibility. It’s not just about making people care; it’s about helping them understand. Second, simplicity helps content spread, but it shouldn’t come at the cost of truth. And finally, the most impactful campaigns today invite people to participate, not just observe.

    Kony 2012 showed us what social media is capable of. But it also reminds us that going viral isn’t the end goal – real, lasting impact is.

  • Influencers’ Impact on The Fashion Industry

    Influencers’ Impact on The Fashion Industry

    If you’ve ever scrolled through Instagram or TikTok and suddenly felt the urge to completely reinvent your wardrobe… you’re not alone. Fashion influencers are everywhere, shaping what we wear, how we shop, and even how we see ourselves. But are they actually helping the fashion world, or making it more chaotic?

    Fashion influencers, at their core, are content creators who share style inspiration, outfit ideas, and brand recommendations with their followers. Some of my favorites are Kiana (@kianaamn), Jade Fiona (@jadeybird), and Ines Silva (@irisloveunicorns). Over time, they’ve become major players in the fashion industry, acting as a bridge between brands and everyday consumers. In fact, research shows that influencers can significantly shape how people perceive brands and whether they decide to make a purchase (Handranata & Kalila, 2025). This, over time, has become a huge deal for brands and designers.

    On the positive side, influencers have made fashion way more accessible. You no longer need to flip through expensive magazines to see trends – now they show up right on your feed. Many influencers also help people discover new brands, experiment with personal style, and feel inspired to express themselves. According to research, followers often turn to influencers for outfit ideas, product opinions, and trend updates, which makes fashion feel more interactive and personal (Escourido-Calvo et al, 2025).

    There’s also the strong feeling of relatability needed by consumers. Unlike traditional models or celebrities, influencers often feel more “real.” They talk directly to their audience, share their daily lives, and build trust. That trust is powerful – when followers perceive influencers as knowledgeable and authentic, they’re more likely to take their advice seriously! Some influencers even use their platforms to promote sustainability, body positivity, or mindful shopping, which can push the industry in a better direction.

    However, for designers and small businesses, there are definitely downsides to fashion influencers.

    One of the biggest criticisms of fashion influencers is overconsumption. If you’ve seen “haul” videos – where creators show off dozens of new clothing items – you’ve probably noticed how normalized constant shopping has become. This kind of content can encourage people to buy more than they need, contributing to fast fashion and waste. Even industry discussions point out that influencer-driven content can blur ethical lines, especially when creators purchase excessive items just for content and return them later (Hildreth, 2026).

    There’s also the issue of authenticity. Not every recommendation is as genuine as it seems. Sponsored posts and brand deals can make it hard to tell whether influencers truly love a product or are just being paid to promote it. Influencers in the past, when it comes to beauty (*cough.. Mikayla Nogueira) or fashion, have been caught exaggerating effects or reviews just to have better results for their videos. Without direct mention of a sponsorship, it can be hard to point out which posts are paid or not.

    And then there’s the pressure. Constant exposure to perfectly curated outfits and lifestyles can make people feel like they’re not “doing enough” with their own style. Some viewers even report changing their shopping habits or buying things they don’t actually need just to keep up. Influencers may be inspiring – but they can also unintentionally set unrealistic standards.

    Something interesting I found is how the influencer space itself is actually evolving. Trends like “de-influencing” and “frugal fashion” are starting to push back against overconsumption, encouraging people to shop more intentionally and rethink their shopping habits. So even within influencer culture, there is a growing awareness of its impact on the fashion industry.

    I created a Substack post explaining our shift of consuming fashion media, and how drastic the change really is. Influencers are just one (very noticeable) piece of that puzzle. So where does that lead the fashion industry moving forward?

    Fashion influencers aren’t entirely good or bad – they’re a mix of both. They inspire creativity and connection, but they can also fuel overconsumption and unrealistic expectations. Like most things online, it really comes down to how we engage with them.

    What do you think about fashion influencers? Do you have any favorites you love (or ones you avoid)? Comment below!

    Works Cited

    DeJesus, V. (2025, March 9). Digital Media is Killing the Fashion Industry [Review of Digital Media is Killing the Fashion Industry]. Substack; Substack. https://vjesus.substack.com/p/digital-media-is-killing-the-fashion?r=56w002&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

    Escourido-Calvo, M., Martin-Bermudez, F., Outes-Castro, F., & Santos, V. R. (2025). The Strategic Impact of Macro and Micro Fashion Influencers on Instagram. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology16(1), 1–18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1947959X25000014?

    Handranata, Y. W., & Kalila, S. (2025). Attitude toward Fashion Influencers and Its Impact on Purchase behavior: the Roles of Brand Attitude and Purchase Intention. Frontiers in Communication10. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/communication/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1583602/full

    Hildreth, A. (2026, April 7). Are Haul Videos Making Fashion’s Returns Problem Worse? Vogue. https://www.vogue.com/article/are-haul-videos-making-fashions-returns-problem-worse?

  • Color Psychology

    Color Psychology

    Have you ever walked into a room and instantly felt calm? Or clicked on a website and felt energized before reading a single word? That’s color psychology at work – the invisible force shaping how we feel before we even think about it.

    Color psychology is essentially the study of how colors influence perception, mood, and even behavior – whether we’re aware of it or not. Colors affect our emotions, our decisions, and our sense of trust and energy in ways that are deeply rooted in both culture and human biology.

    At its core, color psychology blends psychology with design: it’s not just about pretty hues but about meaning. In marketing, designers choose colors intentionally to influence how people feel about a brand or product. For example, a brand might use blue to evoke security and trust, or red to create excitement and urgency. It completely depends on the emotions that the brands want their consumers to feel!

    But before you can use colors with intention, it helps to understand color theory itself. At the heart of color theory is the color wheel, a simple visual tool that maps how hues relate to one another. Imagine the wheel as a rainbow circle where primary colors like red, blue, and yellow sit as the foundational building blocks. From there, mixing these creates complementary colors like green and orange, and then tertiary hues that bridge those gaps.

    Color theory is about relationships: how colors contrast, complement, or harmonize with one another. Complementary colors (those opposite on the wheel) can make a design pop, while analogous colors (those next to each other) feel harmonious and soothing (Decker, 2023). Learning these relationships lets designers craft palettes that tell a story — visually and emotionally.

    Once you understand the wheel, you can start interpreting color meaning. While these interpretations aren’t set in stone, general psychological associations do exist, and are widely used in UX, branding, and marketing. For instance:

    • Red often signals energy, urgency, or passion, and grabs attention quickly.
    • Blue tends to be calming and trustworthy, which is why we see it so often in technology and health companies.
    • Green conjures nature, growth, and stability – think health, refreshment, and wellness contexts.
    • Yellow radiates warmth and happiness but can lead to negative emotions like anxiety and uneasiness.

    Information from “Color Psychology: How To Use it in Marketing and Branding” by Bailey Maybray.

    This really important graphic shows every color and their meanings!

    These associations come from cultural conditioning, shared symbolism, and the way our brains interpret visual information. Color can even bias decision‑making: people make first impressions about products based on color alone, long before text or layout comes into play.

    Of course, color psychology isn’t totally universal — individual and cultural differences matter. What feels peaceful in one context might feel cold or distant in another. That’s why good designers learn not just theory, but empathy: testing, experiencing, and refining based on how everyone reacts.

    So next time you choose a palette — whether for a room, a brand, or a poster — it may be fun to ask: What am I trying to communicate? Because behind the aesthetics lies a powerful psychological tool that can shape feeling, focus, and emotional connection — all through the simple brilliance of color.